The last comprehensive examination of our Requests for Adminship (RfA) system occurred in 2015.
#Pick a number between 1 and 3 software gore trial#
10.3.3 Discussion (8B.alt Trial Admin election).10.3.2 Oppose (8B.alt Trial Admin election).10.3.1 Support (8B.alt Trial Admin election).
10.1.3 Discussion 8A PROD-style adminship. 10 Issue 8: RfA should not be the only road to adminship. 9.5.3 Discussion (7E New "Semi-protector" role). 9.5.2 Oppose (7E New "Semi-protector" role). 9.5.1 Support (7E New "Semi-protector" role). 9.5 Closed: 7E New "Semi-protector" role. 9.4.3 Discussion (7D Remove autopatrolled from default toolkit). 9.4.2 Oppose (7D Remove autopatrolled from default toolkit). 9.4.1 Support (7D Remove autopatrolled from default toolkit). 9.4 Passed: 7D Remove autopatrolled from default toolkit. 9.3.3 Discussion 7C Unbundle blocking from the admin rights. 9.3.2 Oppose 7C Unbundle blocking from the admin rights. 9.3.1 Support 7C Unbundle blocking from the admin rights. 
9.3 Closed: 7C Unbundle blocking from the admin rights.9.2.3 Discussion 7B Researcher userright.9 Issue 7: Admin permissions and unbundling.8.5.3 Discussion 6E Initial probationary term (optional).8.5.2 Oppose 6E Initial probationary term (optional).8.5.1 Support 6E Initial probationary term (optional).8.5 6E Initial probationary term (optional).8.4.3 Discussion 6D Initial probationary term (mandatory).8.4.2 Oppose 6D Initial probationary term (mandatory).8.4.1 Support 6D Initial probationary term (mandatory).8.4 Withdrawn: 6D Initial probationary term (mandatory).8.3.3 Discussion 6C Administrative action review.8.3.2 Oppose 6C Administrative action review.8.3.1 Support 6C Administrative action review.8.1.3 Discussion 6A Binding recall criteria.8.1.2 Oppose 6A Binding recall criteria.8.1.1 Support 6A Binding recall criteria.8 Issue 6: Lifetime tenure (high stakes atmosphere).7.1.3 Discussion 5A Revise standard Question 1.7.1.2 Oppose 5A Revise standard Question 1.7.1.1 Support 5A Revise standard Question 1.
7.1 Passed: 5A Revise standard Question 1. 7 Issue 5: "No need for the tools" is a poor reason as we can find work for new admins. 6.3 Withdrawn: 4C Add an optional sponsorship program for admin trainees and apprentices. 6.2 Withdrawn: 4B Establish an optional admin school with approved curriculum. 6.1.3 Discussion 4A Opt-out sortition to nominate candidates. 6.1.2 Oppose 4A Opt-out sortition to nominate candidates. 6.1.1 Support 4A Opt-out sortition to nominate candidates. 6.1 Closed: 4A Opt-out sortition to nominate candidates. 5.1.3 Discussion (3A Add clear criteria for users to start an RfA). 5.1.2 Oppose (3A Add clear criteria for users to start an RfA). 5.1.1 Support (3A Add clear criteria for users to start an RfA). 5.1 Closed: 3A Add clear criteria for users to start an RfA. 
5 Issue 3: Standards needed to pass keep rising. 4.4.3 Discuss 2E Use year numbers instead of iteration numbers in RfA page titles. 4.4.2 Oppose 2E Use year numbers instead of iteration numbers in RfA page titles. 4.4.1 Support 2E Use year numbers instead of iteration numbers in RfA page titles. 4.4 Closed: 2E Use year numbers instead of iteration numbers in RfA page titles. 4.2 Withdrawn: 2C Cohorts of candidates. 4.1.3 Discussion 2A Introduce an optional "generic question" at least 48 hours into an RfA. 4.1.2 Oppose 2A Introduce an optional "generic question" at least 48 hours into an RfA. 4.1.1 Support 2A Introduce an optional "generic question" at least 48 hours into an RfA. 4.1 Closed: 2A Introduce an optional "generic question" at least 48 hours into an RfA. 3.3.3 Discussion (Semiprotect all RFAs/voter requirements). 3.3.2 Oppose (Semiprotect all RFAs/voter requirements). 3.3.1 Support (Semiprotect all RFAs/voter requirements). 3.3 Closed: 1C Semiprotect all RFAs/voter requirements. 3.2.3 Discussion 1B Zero tolerance for incivility or personal attacks. 3.2.2 Oppose 1B Zero tolerance for incivility or personal attacks. 3.2.1 Support 1B Zero tolerance for incivility or personal attacks. 3.2 Closed: 1B Zero tolerance for incivility or personal attacks. 3.1 Closed: 1A Formal moderation of RfA.
0 kommentar(er)
